Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas D. Williams, Appellant, v. John C. Montgomery, Respondent, 1875 — 60 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas D. Williams, Appellant, v. John C. Montgomery, Respondent
60 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas D. Williams, Appellant, v. John C. Montgomery, Respondent.
(Argued April 13, 1875;
decided April 27, 1875.)
This was an appeal from a Glen eral Term order affirming an order of Special Term, which denied a motion on the part of plaintiff for a new trial.
The motion was made upon affidavits, among the'm affidavits of jurors, and upon the grounds of misconduct of the defendant and others interested with him, in conversing with the jurors, of misconduct of the jurors, and of the constable having them in charge.
The court dismissed the appeal, reaffirming the principle that jurors cannot be heard by affidavits or otherwise to impeach their verdict. (Goster v. Merest, 3 Brod. & Bing., 272; Glum v. Smith, 5 Hill, 560.)
Also, that applications to set aside verdicts, reports of referees or judgments, for matters in pais, dehors the record, are addressed to the discretion of the court of original jurisdiction, and orders made granting or refusing such applications are not reviewable in thjs court. (Code, § 11, sub. 4; Foot v. Lathrop, 41 N. Y., 358; Garrington v. Florida B. B. Go.,2 Alb. Law Journal, 344; 52 N. Y., 583; Gray v. Fislce, 53 id., 630 ; Livermore y. Bainbridge, 56 id., 72; King v. Platt, 34 How., 26; 27 N. Y., 155; Lawrence v. ATy, 38 id., 42; Watertown Bk. v. Jfe, 51 id., 558.)
N. C. Marvin for the appellant.
W. H. Johnson for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for dismissal of appeal.
All concur; Miller, J., not sitting.
Appeal dismissed.