Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents International Union, AFL-CIO, 1959 — 361 U.S. 872 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents International Union, AFL-CIO
361 U.S. 872·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 15.
National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents International Union, AFL-CIO.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 358 U. S. 944, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. • The contentions raised by respondent’s memorandum ^respecting abatement or mootness are overruled. . The contingent motion of Insurance Workers International Union, AFLI-GIO, for leave to file a brief is denied.' Consideration of petitioner’s motion to join Insurance Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, and respondent’s contingent motion to delete it as a party respondent are postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. The motion of the Prudential Insurance Company of America for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
Solicitor General Rankin and Stuart Rothman for petitioner. Isaac N. Groner for respondent and for Insurance Workers International Union, AFL-CIO. Nahum A. Bernstein and Donald R. Seawell for Prudential Insurance Company of America.