Tax
LOUISVILLE BANKING CO. v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE
88 F. 988·United States Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky·1898
Before HARLAN, Circuit Justice, and TAFT and LURTON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LOUISVILLE BANKING CO. v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE.
(Circuit Court, D. Kentucky.
June 4, 1898.)
No. 6,562.
Helm & Bruce, for complainant.
Henry L: Stone, for city of Louisville.
Before HARLAN, Circuit Justice, and TAFT and LURTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — TAFT, Circuit Judge.]
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the same questions as are presented in the case of Louisville Banking Co. v. Stone, infra, already disposed of, hut involves the taxes for 1893 and 1894. The taxes for 1895, 1896, 1897, and 1898 were involved in the prior ease. The order will be that the preliminary injunction prayed for shall issue, and that the demurrers to the bills be overruled.