Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Andrew J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Patterson et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents, 1896 — 150 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
General
Andrew J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Patterson et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents
150 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew J. Rogers, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Patterson et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents.
(Argued June 11, 1896;
decided October 6, 1896.)
Rogers v. Patterson, 79 Hun, 483, affirmed.
Appeal from final judgment of ■ the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 20, 1894, and from an order and interlocutory judgment of the General Term, entered July 30,1894, and August 8, 1894, respectively, which sustained demurrers to the complaint and reversed an interlocutory judgment of the court at Special Term overruling the demurrers.
George M. Balter for appellant.
Charles Fox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with leave to plaintiff to amend his complaint within twenty days upon payment of costs.
All concur.