Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Willis J. Benedict, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant; William M. Bacon, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Samuel S. Bame, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Peter Cook, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Andrew M. Cole, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; August Datt, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Daniel E. Dole, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Joseph J. Farthing, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Charles B. Howard, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Frederick Holland, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; William Holloway, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; The Same, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; The Same, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Robert Kelley, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; George F. Kittridge, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; George W. Long, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Harriet A. Noyes, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Eugene G. Peugeot, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Ansel S. Raze, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Joseph P. Smith, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Christopher Schneinder, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; A. Walter Tryon, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; Elroy West, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant; John Norris, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US