Corporations

Gay Stanton, Respondent, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Vardine Paratransit, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Gay Stanton, Respondent, v. Hexam Gardens Construction Company, Inc., Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

127 A.D.2d 879·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1987·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Gay Stanton, Respondent, v Consolidated Rail Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Vardine Paratransit, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Gay Stanton, Respondent, v Hexam Gardens Construction Company, Inc., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) [MAJORITY] Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Graves, J.), entered May 7, 1986 in Schenectady County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a joint trial of both actions. Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Justice Guy A. Graves. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.