Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Frederick E. Bates, Appellant, v. Robert G. H. Speed et al., Respondents, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 670 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Frederick E. Bates, Appellant, v. Robert G. H. Speed et al., Respondents
142 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Frederick E. Bates, Appellant, v. Robert G. H. Speed et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 38, 1894;
decided May 4, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made November 21, 1893, which reversed an order of the Special Term denying a motion for increased costs.
Frederick Collin for appellant.
A. J. Robertson for respondents.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 303.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.