Corporations
Russell Robinson and Gordon Miller, Respondents, v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corporation, Appellant
241 A.D. 658·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1934·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Russell Robinson and Gordon Miller, Respondents, v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corporation, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the motion was not made within ten days after the service of the answer, as required by rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice. (Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308.) This disposition is, of course, without prejudice to the plaintiffs’ right at the trial to move to dismiss the affirmative defense and counterclaim as insufficient in law. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 279.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.