General
John James Jackson et al., Libelants-Appellants, v. Steamship ARCHIMEDES, Lamport & Holt Line, Limited, Claimant-Respondent
11 F.2d 1000·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John James Jackson et al., Libelants-Appellants, v. Steamship ARCHIMEDES, Lamport & Holt Line, Limited, Claimant-Respondent.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 3, 1926.)
No. 366.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Silas B. Axtell, of New York City (John W. Davis and James M. Nieely, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Burlingham, Veeder, Hasten & Fearey, of New York City (Van Veehten 'Veeder and William J. Dean, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Frederic R. Coudert and Howard Thayer Kingsbury, both of New York City, for British Embassy, amici curias.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (10 F. [2d] 234) affirmed, on the opinion of Judge Augustus N. Hand in the court below.