General
SHANNON LACH v. RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL E. WELCH)
247 Conn. 439·Connecticut Supreme Court·1999·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHANNON LACH v. RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL E. WELCH)
(SC 15890)
Callahan, C. X, and Borden, Norcott, Katz and Palmer, Js.
Argued December 8, 1998
officially released January 19, 1999
Frederic E. Mascolo, for the appellants (defendant et al.).
James Wu, with whom was Joseph J. Fairchild, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Kenneth J. Bartschi, with whom were Susan M. Cormier, Bridget Jenkins and, on the brief, Michael McHale, legal intern, for the minor child.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was granted improvidently.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal for lack of a final judgment?” Lack v. Welch, 244 Conn. 912, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).