General
DE GREE v. HINCHMAN
253 F. 986·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DE GREE v. HINCHMAN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 30, 1918.)
No. 3202.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Alaska, Division No. 1.
J. H. Cobb, of Juneau, Alaska, for plaintiff in error. Cheney & Ziegler, of Juneau, Alaska, for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Motion of counsel for defendant in error for dismissal ol" writ of error, for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with provisions of rifles-23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, vi, 144 C. C. A. v, vi), granted, and writ of error dismissed.