Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry N. Burhans et al., Appellants, v. Union Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Canton, N. Y., Respondent, 1901 — 165 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
General
Henry N. Burhans et al., Appellants, v. Union Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Canton, N. Y., Respondent
165 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry N. Burhans et al., Appellants, v. Union Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Canton, N. Y., Respondent.
Burhans v. Union Free School District, 24 App. Div. 429, affirmed.
(Argued December 31, 1900;
decided February 5, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made December 18, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of plain- ■ tiffs entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial.
Thomas Hogan for appellants.
Ledyard P. Hale for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.