Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1963 — 374 U.S. 819 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
374 U.S. 819·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and-order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8, Original.
Arizona v. California et al.,
[MAJORITY]
373 U. S. 546. The motion of the State of California for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing is granted and the time is extended to September 16, 1963. It is ordered that the time for the submission of a proposed decree fixed by the opinion of this Court of June 3, 1963, be extended for a period of thirty days thereafter or following the action of the Court on any petition for re-
hearing submitted by the State of California.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and-order.