Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
R.P., et ux., petitioners, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SEVICES, et al., 2017 — 137 S. Ct. 713 · caselaw · US
General
R.P., et ux., petitioners, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SEVICES, et al.
137 S. Ct. 713196 L. Ed. 2d 580·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R.P., et ux., petitioners,
v.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SEVICES, et al.
No. 16-500.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 9, 2017.
Motion of respondent The Minor, Alexandria P. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Motion of respondent Father J.E. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.