Contracts · MBE-tested
Thompson v. Thompson
420 U.S. 914·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 18, 1975
No. 74-58.
Thompson v. Thompson.
'MR. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 74-100, Garner v. United States, infra, p. 923; No. 74-454, Procunier v. Valrie, infra, p. 938; No. 74-718, Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk, infra, p. 916; No. 74-719, Neale v. Hayduk, infra, p. 915; No. 74-730, Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland, infra, p. 922; No. 74-5182, Zamorano v. Illinois, infra, p. 924; No. 74-5330, Manuri v. California, infra, p. 924; No. 74-5363, Fulford V. Louisiana, infra, p. 924; No. 74-5390, Muse v. Gunn, infra, p. 924; No. 74-5446, Richards v. United States, infra, p. 924; No. 74r-5453, Stagakis v. United States, infra, p. 924; No. 74r-5454, Thornton v. United States, infra, p. 924; No. 74-5497, Duggan v. Brown, infra, p. 916.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Super. Ct. Pa. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question.