General
Nathan Gold, Appellant, v. Emanuel Mehl and Leon Herman, Respondents, and Another, Defendant
247 A.D. 759·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathan Gold, Appellant, v. Emanuel Mehl and Leon Herman, Respondents, and Another, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
In an action to vacate a judgment in favor of respondent Herman entered in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, order granting motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.