General
Marie P. Molloy et al., Respondents, v. Stella I. D'Angelillo, Appellant. (And Another Action.)
267 A.D.2d 65699 N.Y.S.2d 676·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marie P. Molloy et al., Respondents, v Stella I. D’Angelillo, Appellant. (And Another Action.)
[699 NYS2d 676]
[MAJORITY]
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered September 2, 1998, which, in a personal injury action arising from an automobile accident, denied the motion of Action No. 1 defendant Stella I. D’Angelillo for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff had not sustained “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The medical report detailing plaintiff’s “serious injuries” (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), along with plaintiff’s affidavit as to the extent of her disabling symptoms, sufficed to raise a factual issue as to whether plaintiff had sustained “serious injury’ as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and thus to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Greco v Five Five Garage Corp., 123 AD2d 422). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.