Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dargusch v. Columbus Bar Association, 1965 — 382 U.S. 845 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Dargusch v. Columbus Bar Association
382 U.S. 845·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 151.
Dargusch v. Columbus Bar Association.
Joseph L. Ranh, Jr., John Silard and Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr., for petitioner.
John L. Davies, Jr., and Sol Morton Isaac for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.