Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edwin R. Wiggin, Respondent, v. The Rider Horse Nail Company, Appellant, 1873 — 52 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
Edwin R. Wiggin, Respondent, v. The Rider Horse Nail Company, Appellant
52 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edwin R. Wiggin, Respondent, v. The Rider Horse Nail Company, Appellant.
(Argued February 12, 1873;
decided February 18, 1873.)
Decided upon the facts in the case; the court holding that there was no evidence to sustain the findings of the referee.
Ira Shafer for the appellant,
T. B. Eldridge for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Peoehah, J.,]
Peoehah, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.