General
James L. Gates, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel P. Parmly et al., Executors, etc.
191 U.S. 557·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 37.
James L. Gates, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel P. Parmly et al., Executors, etc.
Argued October 22, 1903.
Decided October 26, 1903.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Circuit Court of Clark County, State of Wisconsin.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall. 379; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Morley v. Lake Shore &c. Railway Company, 146 U. S. 162; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207.
Mr. Bvhlee A. Cole for plaintiff in error.
Mr. A. B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton for defendants in- error.