Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hamilton et al. v. Municipal Court for the Berkeley-Albany Judicial District, 1969 — 396 U.S. 985 · caselaw · US
General
Hamilton et al. v. Municipal Court for the Berkeley-Albany Judicial District
396 U.S. 985·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 464.
Hamilton et al. v. Municipal Court for the Berkeley-Albany Judicial District.
Marshall W. Krause for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.