Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HUSTON, JUDGE, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. HASKELL, GOVERNOR, 1910 — 215 U.S. 592 · caselaw · US
General
HUSTON, JUDGE, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. HASKELL, GOVERNOR
215 U.S. 592·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUSTON, JUDGE, v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. HASKELL, GOVERNOR.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA.
No. 325.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 20, 1909.
Decided January 3, 1910.
Writ of error to review judgment of highest court of a State, dismissed ' for want of jurisdiction without opinion on authority of previous decisions.
Writ of error to review 21 Oklahoma, 782, dismissed.
Mr, E. G. Spilman for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. A. C. Cruce for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Haire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Corkran Oil Co. v. Arnaudet, 199 U. S. 146; Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; case below, 21 Oklahoma, 782.