Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
KILLIAN v. EBBINGHAUS, 1884 — 111 U.S. 798 · caselaw · US
General
KILLIAN v. EBBINGHAUS
111 U.S. 79828 L. Ed. 593·Supreme Court of the United States·1884
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KILLIAN v. EBBINGHAUS.
ORIGINAL.
Submitted April 21st, 1884
Decided May 5th, 1884.
Mandate — Practice.
An appeal was taken from the court below by appellant under an incorrect description, not corresponding with the title in the court below. Under this incorrect title proceedings were conducted to final judgment here and a mandate issued. That mandate is now recalled and a new one issued conforming the title and description to those in the court below.
This was a motion to correct an error in the mandate issued on the judgment reported in Killian v. Ebbinghaus, 110 U. S. 568.
Mr. Garnett and Mr. Robinson for the motion.
Mr. Cuppy and Mr. Dye opposing.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This suit was brought against the trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, then in possession of the premises in dispute. They answered by that name, setting up their title to the property and their claim to the possession. The record shows a notice by Ebbinghaus, the appellee and comp'lainant below, to the trustees of the German Evangelical Lutheran Concordia Church. The final decree was against the “ trustees or authorities of the said Concordia Church, whether under the name of the trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, or under the name of the trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church.” The trustees appealed, but in their appeal bond they described themselves as trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church. The case was entered here promptly and docketed in the name of John G. Killian et al., trusteesw of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church Appellants v. John W. Ebbinghaus, trustee. Both parties appeared and argued the case, as presented by the record, on its merits. No objection was made tó the form of the appeal. A mandate which was sent to the court below described the appeal as “taken by John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church.” As in this there was error, the mandate has been recalled, and we now order that a new mandate issue describing the cause below as between John W. Ebbinghaus, trustee, complainant, and John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, and August Sievers et al., trustees of the Eirst Reformed church defendants (Equity, No. 5,688) and the appeal as “taken by John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church.”
It is so ordered.