General
In the Matter of Richard Pellicane, Appellant, v. Robert V. Nardy et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southampton, et al., Respondents
83 A.D.2d 842·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1981·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Richard Pellicane, Appellant, v Robert V. Nardy et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southampton, et al., Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southampton which denied petitioner’s application for area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), dated November 3, 1980, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Special Term properly determined that the Zoning Board of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to grant the 10 requested area variances (see Van Deusen v Jackson, 35 AD2d 58, affd 28 NY2d 608; cf. Matter of Cohalan v Schermerhorn, 77 Misc 2d 23). Gulotta, J.P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.