Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Bryon FOSTER v. STATE of Arkansas

316 Ark. 438873 S.W.2d 153·Arkansas Supreme Court·1994·AR

Dudley and Corbin, JJ., not participating.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Bryon FOSTER v. STATE of Arkansas CR 94-229 873 S.W.2d 153 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 21, 1994 Bill Luppen, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Bryon Foster, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, William Luppen, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Dudley and Corbin, JJ., not participating.