Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KERBAUGH
74 F.2d 749·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1935
Argued before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KERBAUGH.
No. 2957.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Jan. 16, 1935.
Harry Marselli, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen. (Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Henry S. Kerbaugh, pro se.
Argued before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The Board of Tax Appeals is authorized to establish its own rules of procedure and to determine whether those rules are complied with. .Where their decision of such a question is not shown to be clearly wrong, it should not be disturbed.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.