Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ernst Thalmann et al., Respondents, v. Capron Knitting Company, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
Ernst Thalmann et al., Respondents, v. Capron Knitting Company, Appellant
182 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ernst Thalmann et al., Respondents, v. Capron Knitting Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 2, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
Thalmann v. Capron Knitting Co., 100 App. Div. 247, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 10, 1905, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
Herbert C. Smyth and Mallard F. Tompkins for appellant.
Frederick B. Van Vorst and J. Markham Marshall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.