Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Income Bondholders of the Peoria & Eastern Railway Co. v. New York Central Railroad Co. et al., 1949 — 336 U.S. 919 · caselaw · US
General
Income Bondholders of the Peoria & Eastern Railway Co. v. New York Central Railroad Co. et al.
336 U.S. 919·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 511.
Income Bondholders of the Peoria & Eastern Railway Co. v. New York Central Railroad Co. et al.
Charles S. Aronstam, Arthur A. Ballantine, John M. Harlan, Lyman M. Tondel, Jr. and Edward L. Friedman, Jr. for petitioners. Gerald E. Dwyer and Samuel H. Hellenbrand for the New York Central Railroad Co. et al.; and James F. Hart for the Peoria & Eastern Railway Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Certiorari denied.