Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William McAllister, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Case et al., Respondents; Henry Judson Morris, Appellant, 1889 — 112 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
General
William McAllister, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Case et al., Respondents; Henry Judson Morris, Appellant
112 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William McAllister, Respondent, v. Joseph S. Case et al., Respondents; Henry Judson Morris, Appellant
(Argued January 15, 1889;
decided January 29, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, made May 7, 1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a stay of proceedings under an order of reference in the above-entitled action and for a vacation of the said order.
William King Hall for appellant..
George A. Strong for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of- Daly, J., at Special Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.