Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Franz Merz, Respondent, v. Interior Conduit and Insulation Company et al., Appellants, 1896 — 151 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
General
Franz Merz, Respondent, v. Interior Conduit and Insulation Company et al., Appellants
151 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Franz Merz, Respondent, v. Interior Conduit and Insulation Company et al., Appellants.
Men v. Interior G. & I. Go., 87 Hun, 430, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 30, 1896;
decided December 15, 1896.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 18, 1895, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating an injunction and continued the injunction.
Eugene M. Lewis for appellants.
David Gerber and A. J. Dittenhoefer for respondent
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.