General
Robert C. Keck v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 683·United States Customs Court·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Reap. Dec. 9469)
Robert C. Keck v. United States
Entry No. 8233, etc.
(Decided June 18, 1959)
MaoLeish, Spray, Price <& Underwood for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Mollison, Judge:]
Mollison, Judge:
Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule.upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise answering to the description of No. 351 Pedals, axle, and that such value is the invoiced unit values, net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.
The appeals having been abandoned as to all merchandise other than that described above, they are, to that extent, dismissed.
Judgment will issue accordingly.