General
David Seaward, Appellant, v. William C. Pahl Construction Co., Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. United Technologies Carrier/Carrier Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
213 A.D.2d 1076625 N.Y.S.2d 989·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1995·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Seaward, Appellant, v William C. Pahl Construction Co., Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. United Technologies Carrier/Carrier Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[625 NYS2d 989]
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Murphy, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.