IP
CAUSEY v. UNITED STATES
203 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1913
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and NEWMAN, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CAUSEY v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 12, 1913.)
No. 2,420.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Wm. I. Grubb, Judge.
T. M. Miller and J. L. Bradford, both of New Orleans, La., for appellant. Charlton R. Beattie, U. S. Atty., of New Orleans, La.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and NEWMAN, District Judge.
Rehearing denied June 2, 1913.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of the judges are of opinion that the evidence submitted in the court below on the trial of this case fully justifies the finding that the appellant, in obtaining and perfecting his homestead entry, was guilty of such fraud as warrants the decree below vacating the patent. Affirmed.