General
Albert A. Manda, Appellant, v. Emilius Etienne, Respondent
183 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert A. Manda, Appellant, v. Emilius Etienne, Respondent.
(Argued December 15, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Manda v. Etienne, 99 App. Div. 923, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 16, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Hector M. Hitchings for appellant.
Henry W. Rudd and M'Cready Sykes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.,_ Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Bartlett, J.