Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Surety Company of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho, to and for the Use and Benefit of Clara Mills et al., 1916 — 241 U.S. 690 · caselaw · US
General
American Surety Company of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho, to and for the Use and Benefit of Clara Mills et al.
241 U.S. 690·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 609.
American Surety Company of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho, to and for the Use and Benefit of Clara Mills et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
April 17, 1916.
Mr. James H. Richards and Mr. Oliver O. Haga for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph H. Peterson for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed, each party paying its own costs, per stipulation of counsel.