Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Caroline E. Perkins, as Executrix, etc., 1895 — 145 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
Administrative
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Caroline E. Perkins, as Executrix, etc.
145 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Caroline E. Perkins, as Executrix, etc.
(Argued February 4, 1895;
decided February 26, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of” the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 12,1894, which affirmed a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York settling the accounts of Caroline E. Perkins, as executrix, etc.
George C. Lay for appellants.
Edward B. Rapallo for respondents.
Reported below, 75 Hun, 129.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.