Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Illinois et al.; and New York et al. v. Illinois et al., 1940 — 309 U.S. 628 · caselaw · US
General
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Illinois et al.; and New York et al. v. Illinois et al.
309 U.S. 628·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
original.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan et al. v. Illinois et al.; and New York et al. v. Illinois et al.
No. 3,
original.
No. 4,
original.
March 4, 1940.
[MAJORITY]
The return to the rule to show cause is received and ordered filed and the cause is assigned for argument on Monday, March 25 next, on the petition for temporary modification of the decree and the return to the rule to show cause.