Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Alexander Meakim et al., Respondents, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 646 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Alexander Meakim et al., Respondents
144 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Alexander Meakim et al., Respondents.
(Submitted November 27, 1894;
decided December 11, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 12, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon an order of the Court of Oyer and Terminer in and for the city and county of New York allowing defendants’ demurrer to the indictment herein.
John D. Lindsay for appellant.
A. J. Dittenhoefer, Gha/rles Donohue and Damid Gerber for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.