Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Guest, President of Methodist Hospital, et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al.; and Williamsport Hospital et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al., 1977 — 429 U.S. 1084 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Guest, President of Methodist Hospital, et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al.; and Williamsport Hospital et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al.
429 U.S. 1084·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-1691.
No. 75-1698.
Guest, President of Methodist Hospital, et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al.; and Williamsport Hospital et al. v. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney of Philadelphia, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 813.] Judgment in No. 75-1691 vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss cause as moot. Judgment in No. 75-1698 vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of intervening circumstances.