Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bryant-Buckner Associates, Inc. v. Danville Tobacco Association et al., 1967 — 387 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
Bryant-Buckner Associates, Inc. v. Danville Tobacco Association et al.
387 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1197.
Bryant-Buckner Associates, Inc. v. Danville Tobacco Association et al.
Frederick Bernays Wiener for petitioner. Edwin B. Meade for respondent Danville Tobacco Association, and Earle Garrett, Jr., Allan Garrett, Earle Garrett III and G. Kenneth Miller for respondent Producers Tobacco Co., Inc.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.