Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AHO v. JACOBSEN, 1959 — 359 U.S. 25 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
AHO v. JACOBSEN
359 U.S. 25·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AHO v. JACOBSEN.
No. 36.
Decided March 2, 1959.
George J: Engelman and Harry Kislofj for petitioner.
Paul R. Frederick for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for retrial on the admiralty side, Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U. S. 354, in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U. S. 625.