Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana; Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al. v. Paul, Director of the Department of Agriculture of California, et al.; Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.; Whipple et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Shott v. Ohio, Illinois et al. v. United States et al.; Flora Construction Co. v. Grand Junction Steel Fabricating Co. et al.; Sturges v. California et al.; Cepero v. United States Congress et al.; Cepero v. United States; Freeman v. Oregon, 1963 — 374 U.S. 858 · caselaw · US