Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna M. Holcombe, as Executrix, etc., Appellant, v. Kneeland J. Munson et al., Respondents, 1886 — 103 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Anna M. Holcombe, as Executrix, etc., Appellant, v. Kneeland J. Munson et al., Respondents
103 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna M. Holcombe, as Executrix, etc., Appellant, v. Kneeland J. Munson et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 35, 1886;
decided November 30,1886.)
This case is not reported for the reason that a majority of the court did not concur in the opinion.
James Lansing for appellant.
Esek Cowen for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Ruger, Ch. J.,]
Ruger, Ch. J.,
reads for affirmance; Miller and Finch, JJ., concur; Rapallo, J., concurs in result; Earl and Dan-forth, JJ., dissent, and Andrews, J., does not vote.
Judgment affirmed.