Administrative
James F. Mooney, Respondent, v. John Loughlin, Appellant
105 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James F. Mooney, Respondent, v. John Loughlin, Appellant.
(Argued April 29, 1887;
decided May 13, 1887)
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment was the only question presented in this action.
Roger A. Pryor for appellant.
Daniel G. Harriman for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Raparlo, J., dissenting, and Earl, J., not voting.
Order affirme .