Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginia Stuart Mackay-Smith et al., as Trustees under the Will of Ellen E. Ward, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Crawford et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Virginia Stuart Mackay-Smith et al., as Trustees under the Will of Ellen E. Ward, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Crawford et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virginia Stuart Mackay-Smith et al., as Trustees under the Will of Ellen E. Ward, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Crawford et al., Respondents.
Maokay-Smith v. Orawford, 56 App. Div. 136, affirmed.
(Argued May 15, 1902;
decided May 29, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 7, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court' on trial at Special Term.
Henry de Forest Baldwin for appellants.
William F. Cook for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.