Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co. et al., 1952 — 342 U.S. 947 · caselaw · US
General
Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co. et al.
342 U.S. 947·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 501.
Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co. et al.
Anthony Bradley Eben, Edward Atlas, and Richard F. Watt for petitioner.
Harold A. Smith and Thomas A. Reynolds for the Truax Traer Coal Co.; and Weymouth Kirkland, Howard Ellis, A. Leslie Hodson and John C. Butler for the United Electric Coal Companies, respondents,
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion for leave to file brief of Seymour F. Simon et al., as amici curiae, denied. Certiorari denied.