General
Annie Camp Field et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company
203 U.S. 585·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 114.
Annie Camp Field et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company.
Argued for the plaintiffs in error and submitted for defendant in error November 16, 1906.
Decided December 3, 1906.
Mr. Richard H. Field for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Wm. C. Scarritt and Mr. E. L. Scarritt for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Field v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, 194 U. S. 618; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Company, 169 U. S. 557. Case below, Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Field, 188 Missouri, 182.