Contracts · MBE-tested
Frankel et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
382 U.S. 985·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 34. No. 35. No. 36.
Frankel et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.
H. H. Hillyer, Jr., for petitioners in Nos. 34 and 35.
Murray Christian, Herbert W. Varner and R. B. Voight for petitioner in No. 36.
Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard A. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein for the Federal Power Commission, respondent in all cases.
Kent H. Brown and Morton L. Simons for Public Service Commission of New York, respondent in Nos. 34 and 35.
Vernon W. Woods and Saunders Gregg for United Gas Pipe Line Co., respondent in No. 36.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of United Gas Pipe Line Co. to be added as a party respondent in No. 36 granted. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 335 F. 2d 1004.