Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 et al. v. Wohl et al., 1941 — 313 U.S. 572 · caselaw · US
General
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 et al. v. Wohl et al.
313 U.S. 572·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 901.
Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 et al. v. Wohl et al.
May 5, 1941.
Mr. Edward C. Maguire for petitioners. Hyman Wohl and Louis Platzman, pro se.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
It does not appear from the record that the federal question presented by the petition was necessarily decided by the Court of Appeals. The petition for certiorari is denied, Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Honeyman v. Hanan, 300 U. S. 14, 18.