Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of George Doheny et al., as Trustees under the Will of Patrick Lynch, Deceased, Appellants. Mary L. Pendergast et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 691 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of George Doheny et al., as Trustees under the Will of Patrick Lynch, Deceased, Appellants. Mary L. Pendergast et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 691·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of George Doheny et al., as Trustees under the Will of Patrick Lynch, Deceased, Appellants. Mary L. Pendergast et al., Respondents.
Matter of Dolieny, 70 App, Div. 370, affirmed.
(Argued June 11, 1902;
decided June 27, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division' of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 29, 1902, which modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term settling the accounts of the petitioners.
Alexander H. Cowie for appellants.
A. D. Jenney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Parker, Ch. J., and Cullen, J.